Administrators Note: This reply is in In response to post in Christian Monotarian forum https://simplychristian.faith/commu...ent-omnipotent-god-permit-evil.883/#post-2259 and moved here as it is a "gentle debate" response.
I wholeheartedly disagree.
First, the only Bible passage you do quote, you quote completely out of context. As a result, if I used evil as you defined in this passages, evil would mean such things as diseases and earthquakes. If you don't have a good definition of evil then you'll get nods from the choir but to everyone else you are talking gibberish.
Second, the word omnipotence is problematic. Whenever you use this word, you need to define it more precisely because omnipotence has a lot of baggage. In Classical Theism, which is the majority of "Christianity", omnipotence is used to describe how God created everything, all time, and all actions in one simple action - Probably not what you were thinking of.
Third, you use the term "free will" without realizing it is a tautology. Once again, a term with even more baggage which requires a very, very careful definition with some knowledge of the baggage that term contains.
So, you're using non-biblical terms without proper context.
Next, you are using circular reasoning in your arguments. You start with "God creates Good and in order to preserve Goods’ potential Evil must also exist in potential", reword that sentence several different ways and end up with " Evil is necessary in order to preserve the potential of Good." Most of your writing involves this. You reword what you said before and claim that as the proof.
Once again, this circular logic is fine if you talking to the choir but will fail with anyone else.
I wholeheartedly disagree.
First, the only Bible passage you do quote, you quote completely out of context. As a result, if I used evil as you defined in this passages, evil would mean such things as diseases and earthquakes. If you don't have a good definition of evil then you'll get nods from the choir but to everyone else you are talking gibberish.
Second, the word omnipotence is problematic. Whenever you use this word, you need to define it more precisely because omnipotence has a lot of baggage. In Classical Theism, which is the majority of "Christianity", omnipotence is used to describe how God created everything, all time, and all actions in one simple action - Probably not what you were thinking of.
Third, you use the term "free will" without realizing it is a tautology. Once again, a term with even more baggage which requires a very, very careful definition with some knowledge of the baggage that term contains.
So, you're using non-biblical terms without proper context.
Next, you are using circular reasoning in your arguments. You start with "God creates Good and in order to preserve Goods’ potential Evil must also exist in potential", reword that sentence several different ways and end up with " Evil is necessary in order to preserve the potential of Good." Most of your writing involves this. You reword what you said before and claim that as the proof.
Once again, this circular logic is fine if you talking to the choir but will fail with anyone else.
Last edited by a moderator: