Two Gardens and a Snake - What ACTUALLY Happened in the Garden of Eden?

[Lori Jane]

Clip source: Two Gardens and a Snake - What ACTUALLY Happened in the Garden of Eden? - YouTube

Two Gardens and a Snake - What ACTUALLY Happened in the Garden of Eden?


121,342 views views

---

Description

121,342 views Sep 28, 2020 Christianity hasn't told you the truth about the Garden of Eden story. We examine the text and discover the real story. Who is Yahweh? Who is the snake? Why is the second garden never mentioned? Key moments View all How Belief Works 9:47 Lord God Planted a Garden in Eden in the East 24:59 Revelation 22 26:13 The Importance of Context 27:55 The Pursuit of Legalism 30:30 The Importance of Removing Metaphor 34:33 The Tree of Life through the Ancient World 36:43 Image of the Sumerian Gods 37:23 Shorts remixing this video 71 views Transcript Follow along using the transcript. Show transcript Israel Anderson 14.8K subscribers Videos About Facebook Twitter Instagram Show less

---

Summary​

• The speaker refers to a critical examination of biblical texts that challenges traditional Christian interpretations, aiming to explore their historical and contextual meanings without the constraints of established doctrine.
• The speaker believes that the narratives presented by traditional Christianity, particularly those influenced by the Roman Church, do not align with the original biblical texts, leading to a personal reevaluation of faith and a deeper exploration of the scriptures.
• The video suggests observing thoughts without judgment, critically reflecting on them before accepting them as truth, and being cautious of adopting beliefs from others without thorough contemplation.
• The video explains that belief involves constructing and latching onto ideas as truths, while faith typically refers to trust and hope in someone or something, such as spiritual promises without needing to interject personal ownership of those ideas.
• The theological dilemma serves as a critical point for analyzing the claims presented in the video, requiring viewers to understand its implications to effectively engage with the topic.
• The narrative of restoration to the garden is central because it encapsulates the essence of humanity's journey and relationship with God, framing the biblical message around themes of access to immortality and divine presence.
• Textualism refers to a strict adherence to the text and its literal meanings, while contextualism considers the broader context, including the cultural and historical background, to understand the essence and intent behind the words.
• Adding metaphors can lead to misinterpretations and errors, as they might fundamentally alter the intended meaning of the original text, obscuring its true message and potentially leading to false understandings.
• Ancient artifacts provide physical evidence of the narratives and myths that have been passed down through generations, often revealing how cultures viewed their gods and the divine. Modern interpretations can sometimes diverge from these original meanings, leading to new understandings of ancient civilizations' beliefs and practices.
• The primary difference lies in the detail and precision achievable with granite, which requires advanced techniques and machinery to remove all unnecessary material effectively and create a detailed relief. Softer stones typically allow for easier carving but may not hold details as intricately over time.
• The dynamic highlights the tendency to evade personal responsibility, as seen when Adam blames Eve for his actions. This interaction with Yahweh emphasizes the importance of accountability and the consequences of one's choices on their identity and existence.
• The fruit from the tree of knowledge symbolizes the awakening to self-awareness and the complexities of moral understanding. It represents the transition from innocence to the burdens of knowledge and responsibility.
• Yeshua's role in Revelation is portrayed as one of restoration, bringing humanity back to a pre-fall condition of free access to the tree of life, while Yahweh's actions in Genesis resulted in a curse that led to separation from that life.
• The Garden of Eden represents the original state of humanity's relationship with God, characterized by access to eternal life and a deep understanding of good and evil. It sets the stage for the narrative of sin and redemption throughout the Bible.
• The challenge lies in reconciling the serpent’s role in promoting a state of knowledge and life with the belief that it is synonymous with Satan. This creates a conflict with the narrative of original sin and the restoration offered by Yeshua.
• The video argues that the serpent is reframed not as a purely evil figure but as Yeshua, the creator, highlighting a deeper symbolic role linked to salvation.
• Yahweh is depicted as a figure who demands punishment and death, while Yeshua represents love and sacrifice, with a clear divergence in their respective roles in biblical texts.
• The New Testament asserts that God, unlike Yahweh who interacted physically in the Old Testament, remains unseen. This distinction emphasizes the transformative understanding of God's nature in the context of Jesus’ revelation.
• It signifies a unique and intimate relationship between Jesus and God, wherein both are depicted as working together in divine endeavors, reinforcing Jesus' authority and role in the divine plan.
• An individual can deepen their scripture study by regularly reading or listening to the Bible, reflecting on passages, and engaging with scholarly insights to explore complex themes and messages within the text.
• Common misconceptions include viewing Yahweh solely as a benevolent figure; some interpretations suggest a more complex role that includes adversarial aspects, challenging traditional views.
• Context is crucial for understanding the meaning and implications of passages; without it, interpretations can become skewed or misrepresentative of the original intent.
• Historically, the mark of the beast is likened to ancient practices in which individuals would receive marks or symbols as proof of their allegiance to a deity or local authority, often tied to economic transactions. This suggests a deeper, more systemic approach to understanding obedience and societal participation in biblical times.
• Such an interpretation raises significant theological questions regarding the nature of divinity, the consistency of scripture, and the moral implications of the actions attributed to Yahweh. It challenges traditional views of God in Christianity and prompts a reevaluation of historical interpretations.
• Ancient symbols provide visual evidence and context that can reveal different beliefs about God and divine beings, offering a lens through which one can challenge modern interpretations that might be based on misunderstandings or misrepresentations of these figures.
• Labeling figures like Marshawn as heretics can lead to the suppression of diverse theological perspectives and restricts broader discussions about the origins and evolution of religious beliefs.
• Community support can significantly impact independent researchers and content creators by providing them with the resources they need to continue their work. Financial contributions, engagement through apps, and participation in mailing lists create a sustainable environment that fosters knowledge sharing and personal connections, enhancing the overall impact of their endeavors.
• The speaker's mention of a coming deception warns of the potential for manipulation and loss of personal freedoms. It suggests that individuals may be misled or coerced into abandoning core beliefs and values, prompting a need for vigilance and critical thinking in today's information landscape.

Two Gardens and a Snake - What ACTUALLY Happened in the Garden of Eden?​

A Non-Traditional Study of the Bible: The Garden of Eden 00:09​

"We're taking a non-Christian approach to the Bible and today we are looking at the Garden of Eden."

• This study reexamines the Garden of Eden, presenting an intense and revised version of a previous analysis titled "Two Gardens and a Snake."
• The intention is to explore the multifaceted aspects of the story, providing comprehensive insights that align with various interpretations and provoke thoughtful discussions among viewers.

Theological Reexamination: Christianity and Personal Faith Journey 01:00​

"The Garden of Eden story has been turned on its head by Rome... I came to the realization that the Christian narrative... was not supported in the Bible."

• The speaker highlights a significant shift in perspective, expressing skepticism towards how traditional Christianity, particularly influenced by the Roman Church, has framed biblical narratives.
• Personal anecdotes reveal a deep-rooted faith in Jesus (Yeshua) and a subsequent journey away from conventional Christianity, emphasizing a desire for a deeper understanding of biblical texts.

The Importance of Context and Ancient Texts 08:53​

"The Bible is a library of books, not just one text. It's made up of multiple fragments written by over 40 different authors."

• The speaker stresses the complexity of the Bible as a collection of texts, underscoring that it contains numerous layers of meaning stemming from various authors and historical contexts.
• This encourages viewers to consider the richness of ancient texts, and how other works, such as the Book of Enoch and the Epic of Gilgamesh, can offer valuable insights into biblical narratives.

Understanding Belief and Its Dangers 09:54​

"We start to accept our thoughts as abject reality or truth."

• The video emphasizes that belief is not merely about faith in people or oneself, but rather involves constructing ideas in our minds and latching onto them as truths.
• This uncritical acceptance can lead to dangerous outcomes as individuals start to claim these constructed beliefs as their identity, stating, “I am a [belief].”
• It highlights the notion that borrowing beliefs from others without critically contemplating them can lead to a loss of one's true self and identity.
• The presenter argues that when individuals adopt beliefs without self-reflection, they merely project a borrowed notion of reality, complicating their understanding of self and beliefs.

The Formation of Ego through Belief 12:09​

"These things create identity attachments and it becomes the formation of our ego."

• As beliefs become intertwined with personal identity, individuals risk creating an ego based on these beliefs.
• This tendency not only fosters a false sense of self but can also lead to conflict when new information challenges these ingrained beliefs.
• The importance of recognizing and observing thoughts without judgment is highlighted as a means to mitigate this danger.
• Awareness of thought processes allows for clearer thinking and helps prevent preconceived beliefs from dictating one's understanding of truth.

The Importance of Critical Thinking 14:02​

"You must ask yourself why one of the single most important stories has been all but erased."

• The importance of critical thinking is stressed, particularly when it comes to understanding the narratives presented in religious contexts.
• The video calls attention to the fact that significant stories within ancient texts might be overlooked or entirely omitted from mainstream discussions, requiring believers to question them deeply.
• Engaging with new and challenging information without the filter of existing beliefs is essential for intellectual and personal growth.
• The presenter suggests employing a reflective approach towards thoughts and beliefs, urging viewers not to solidify their understanding prematurely without comprehensive exploration.

The Theological Dilemma 20:49​

"Be ready for some very inventive responses; Roman universalism has done everything it can to conceal the truth from us."

• The speaker urges viewers to engage with the content, emphasizing that feedback is welcomed, especially from those who have been invited by parishioners.
• A theological dilemma will be presented later in the video, and understanding it is essential to debunking the speaker's claims.
• The discussion points towards a complex revelation, indicating that this topic has bewildered many and requires open-mindedness from the audience.

The Garden Narrative 22:19​

"The entire story of humankind is about our access to the fruit of the tree of life."

• The video posits that the Bible's overarching narrative revolves around the theme of restoration to a paradisiacal garden, beginning and ending in a garden setting.
• Attention is drawn to the garden's significance, particularly the tree of life, which symbolizes the journey toward immortality and divine relationship.
• Many churchgoers may not grasp this essential storyline that hinges on the beginning and end of the human experience within the biblical context.

Ignoring the Central Message 24:20​

"This is incredible; this is the story that brackets every other story. It should be the central message of Christianity, but instead, it's ignored."

• The speaker highlights that the broader theme of humanity's restoration to the garden is often overlooked by churches, despite its foundational importance to Christian belief.
• While significant events like Jesus’ crucifixion are critical, they are positioned as part of a midpoint in the much grander narrative of returning to the garden and accessing the tree of life.
• There is a sense of urgency in conveying this core message, as the speaker believes it has been largely unaddressed throughout traditional teachings.

Importance of Context 27:54​

"The way we approach the text is really important; context refers to those objects or entities which surround a focal event."

• Context, in disciplines like semiotics and linguistics, is defined as the framework that surrounds and aids in interpreting events, indicating that understanding original intent is crucial for true comprehension.
• The distinction between textualism and contextualism is explored, particularly in legal interpretations, showcasing how a lack of context could lead to misunderstandings of foundational texts like the Constitution.
• The speaker emphasizes the need to grasp the original meanings of words as they were understood at the time of writing, rather than applying present-day definitions.

The Importance of Understanding Context in Biblical Interpretation 32:28​

"Beware of Bible teachers that are textualists, not contextualists."

• The concept of textualism versus contextualism in biblical interpretation is crucial. Textualists adhere strictly to the literal definitions of words, while contextualists consider the broader meanings and implications within the text's original context.
• This distinction is particularly highlighted in the teachings of Yeshua, who criticized the religious leaders of his time, namely the Pharisees, for focusing solely on the letter of the law rather than understanding its spirit.
• Today's Christians are warned against similar pitfalls, as the textualist approach can lead to misinterpretations and misunderstandings of key biblical messages.

The Risks of Adding Metaphors in Biblical Text 33:34​

"Adding metaphor increases the potential for error."

• Incorporating metaphors can significantly alter the intended meaning of biblical passages. The speaker emphasizes the importance of returning to a plain reading of the text, stripping away any additional metaphoric interpretations that have accumulated over centuries.
• This approach not only aims to clarify the original intent of the scriptures but also reduces the likelihood of errors that could arise from misinterpretations driven by personal or cultural lenses.
• Understanding the context of the original authors and their audiences can provide deeper insights into the biblical narrative.

Exploring the Tree of Life Across Cultures 36:43​

"What if we could find that tree of life throughout the ancient world? Well, we can."

• The Tree of Life, first introduced in the Garden of Eden with Adam and Eve, is a recurring symbol throughout various ancient civilizations. This symbolic tree is essential for connecting different cultural narratives regarding life, death, and divinity.
• As the discussion progresses, it reveals ancient iconography and religious imagery from Sumerian, Hindu, and other cultures that depict gods associated with the Tree of Life and related symbols, such as handbags believed to hold significant mythical content.
• By examining these cultural parallels, we gain valuable insights into how ancient societies understood and depicted spiritual concepts, underscoring the universality of these themes.

The Technical Art of Stone Carving 43:29​

"This is granite, the ability to carve intricate details in relief is extremely technical."

• The discussion focuses on the distinct techniques used in the art of stone carving, particularly emphasizing the difference between granite and softer stones. While traditional methods entail carving an image into stone, this technique involves removing material to reveal a detailed relief.
• Advanced machines are employed to achieve a high level of precision, allowing for extraordinary detail to last for thousands of years. The examples given highlight various engraved stones, suggesting that they are not just artistic expressions but also significant historical artifacts.

Examples of Engraved Stone 44:20​

"We find these all across the ancient world, showcasing crystal-clear designs."

• The segment presents several exemplary engravings, including depictions of gods holding fruit and handbags, rich in symbolic meaning. These symbols, notably the winged disc, signify the figure known as Enki in Sumerian mythology, hinting at the interconnectedness of these carvings across different cultures.
• The close-ups reveal intricate designs, such as the hinge on a handbag, demonstrating a high level of craftsmanship in these ancient artifacts.

Gobekli Tepe and the Handbags of the Gods 45:15​

"This is probably the oldest example in the world of the handbags of the gods."

• The discussion moves to Gobekli Tepe in Turkey, highlighting its significance as a potential location of biblical references. This area features imagery, often linked to deities, holding handbags, thus raising questions about the historical narratives surrounding such symbols.
• The speaker expresses a belief that important knowledge about these findings is concealed from the public, indicating a gap between what is understood in scholarly circles and what is communicated to the broader audience.

Ancient Civilizations and the Tree of Life 47:35​

"Throughout the ancient world, we have evidence that tells us about the fruit of the tree of life."

• The speaker traces the myth of the Tree of Life through various ancient cultures, illustrating how these narratives reflect a shared understanding of divinity and longevity. They suggest that gods had exclusive access to certain life-prolonging knowledge, selectively imparting it to humans.
• Various ancient cultures are mentioned, with the speaker stressing that the central figures in these accounts are commonly acknowledged yet warrant deeper exploration to grasp their significance fully.

The Role of Yahweh in the Biblical Narrative 49:49​

"In this study, we're going to use the actual transliteration of the Hebrew word that has been translated as God."

• Transitioning to a deeper examination of the biblical text, the speaker introduces Yahweh, emphasizing the importance of using the correct terminology. Exploring the word "Elohim," which appears in the early chapters of Genesis, they highlight its plural nature and how translation choices may reflect cultural biases.
• The speaker plans to analyze the narrative of the Garden of Eden in five acts, intertwining various textual interpretations while inviting viewers to reconsider preconceived notions about familiar biblical stories.

The Moment of Realization 55:10​

"Adam and Eve were able to participate in conversations but didn't have even the self-awareness to notice they were naked."

• Before eating the fruit from the tree of knowledge, Adam and Eve existed in a state of innocence, lacking self-awareness. They engaged in communication, yet were oblivious to their nakedness, signifying a lack of understanding of their condition.
• Eve, upon seeing that the forbidden tree bore fruit that was visually appealing and promised wisdom, decided to eat of it. She subsequently offered the fruit to Adam, who also partook.

The Awakening of Self-Awareness 55:56​

"Then their eyes were opened, and they both realized that they were naked."

• After consuming the fruit, Adam and Eve's eyes were metaphorically opened, and they gained self-awareness. This newfound consciousness led them to realize their nakedness, resulting in them sewing fig leaves to cover themselves.
• This pivotal moment marked the transition from innocence to self-awareness. The terms used to describe their experience included being conscious, awake, or enlightened—a controversial term among some Christian interpretations.

The Interaction with Yahweh 56:31​

"They hid from Yahweh among the trees in the garden."

• After their awakening, Adam and Eve hid from Yahweh in the garden, raising questions about the nature of God as a non-physical being. The speaker highlights that the narrative often depicts Yahweh as a physical presence, contradicting traditional views of omnipresence.
• Yahweh asks Adam where he is, leading to speculation about his omniscience. The addition of the first question Yahweh poses, "Who told you that you were naked?" emphasizes the importance of self-awareness stemming from external sources.

The Significance of the First Question 58:22​

"Who told you that you were naked?"

• This first question asked by Yahweh implies that self-awareness can arise from external validation or information—underlining the significance of who or what provides such awareness.
• The inquiry suggests an acknowledgment of other potential influences in the garden. It raises the question of the presence of other entities that could have imparted knowledge to Adam and Eve about their condition.

The Consequences of Disobedience 01:01:44​

"The woman you gave me gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it."

• Adam's response to Yahweh's inquiry about eating the forbidden fruit reflects a tendency to deflect responsibility onto Eve. This pivot highlights a recurring theme of blame in human behavior.
• Yahweh's curses—emanating from the disobedience—impact all three parties involved: the snake, Eve, and Adam. Each curse brings forth a unique consequence, fundamentally altering the nature of their existence and their relationship with Yahweh and each other.

The Expulsion from Eden 01:06:29​

"Yahweh sent the man out of the garden of Eden to farm the ground from which the man had been formed."

• Following the disobedience, Yahweh expels Adam and Eve from the garden, forcing them into a life of toil outside its paradise. Adam is now tasked with farming the land rather than residing in a place of abundance.
• This expulsion symbolizes a profound shift from divine care to human struggle, marking a key transformation in humanity's relationship with nature and Yahweh.

The Theological Implications of the Garden Story 01:06:55​

"Yahweh deprived them of the fruit of the tree of life which they previously had access to, and that is explicit in the text."

• The narrative begins with the idea that humanity was originally deprived of eternal life and understanding due to their actions in the Garden of Eden. The text suggests that their eating from the tree of knowledge did not lead to immediate death, but instead, it was Yahweh's actions that led to a form of spiritual death by removing access to the tree of life.
• This leads to a deeper exploration into the implications of this separation and the events that transpire in the garden. It sets up a framework for understanding the progression of the story from Genesis to Revelation.

The Journey from Eden to Restoration 01:07:30​

"The story starts in the beginning of Genesis... ends in another garden within a city at the end of the last book of the Bible, Revelation."

• The video suggests that the narrative of humanity spans two distinct gardens: the Garden of Eden and a final garden in Revelation. This journey emphasizes the transformation of humanity and the overarching theme of restoration through divine intervention.
• The implication is that between these gardens, significant theological developments occur, leading to the introduction of Yeshua and the promise of restoration to a pre-fall state.

Yeshua's Role in Restoration 01:09:49​

"What Yeshua restores to us is free access to the fruit of all the trees and to live forever."

• Yeshua's arrival is significant as it parallels the events of the initial garden. In Revelation, he is depicted as the one who restores the conditions that humanity originally had—access to eternal life and the fruit from all trees.
• This restoration brings attention to a dichotomy where the state created by the serpent aligns closely with what Yeshua achieves in the end. This raises questions about the roles of both figures in the biblical narrative.

The Theological Dilemma of Original Sin 01:14:11​

"This is an obvious theological dilemma that you've never been taught because it's immediately obvious that the snake simply can't be Satan."

• The video highlights a theological conflict regarding the identity of the serpent and its implications on the concept of original sin. If the serpent is indeed Satan, then how can Yeshua's restoration align with the serpent's creation of a desirable state for humanity?
• This presents a challenge to traditional Christian teachings and invites viewers to reconsider the narratives they have been taught, particularly about sin, redemption, and the true nature of divine authority.

The Nature of the Divine in the Biblical Narrative 01:17:49​

"The Bible talks about gods all over the place actually."

• The video proposes that the biblical text may support a view of multiple divine figures rather than a strictly monotheistic god. This notion opens avenues for understanding the dynamics of power, authority, and creation as described within scripture.
• The discussion leads to exploring the identification of Yahweh with the ruling powers in Eden and contrasts with the figure of Yeshua, suggesting a reevaluation of these characters in the light of biblical evidence.

The Identity of the Serpent 01:19:32​

"The snake is Yeshua, the creator of mankind."

• The video discusses how in Revelation 22, Yeshua identifies himself with the serpent, drawing a connection to the event in Numbers 21 from the Old Testament.
• In this account, Yahweh sent fiery serpents to punish the people of Israel, and when they repented, Moses was instructed to create a bronze serpent.
• Those who were bitten and looked at the bronze serpent were healed, and this act is interpreted by scholars as a foreshadowing of Yeshua's role as Savior, revealing a deeper theological connection.

Yeshua's Connection to the Divine 01:21:30​

"Yeshua identifies as the bronze serpent."

• The discussion highlights how Yeshua, particularly in John 3:14-15, likens himself to the bronze serpent lifted by Moses, indicating the necessary belief in him for eternal life.
• This identification challenges traditional views of the serpent as purely a negative symbol, suggesting instead a positive role in the narrative as tied to the creator.

The Nature of God in Genesis 01:22:44​

"The word used for God is 'Elohim.'"

• The video explores the distinction between Yahweh and the term Elohim, noting that Elohim is a plural term suggesting a divine counsel of multiple beings involved in creation.
• The speaker emphasizes the inherent grammatical complexity in Genesis where a singular "God" is presented alongside multiple references, pointing to a potential misunderstanding of the relationship between Yahweh and Yeshua.

Contrasts Between Yahweh and Yeshua 01:30:03​

"Yahweh never mentions having a son."

• The video compares the figures of Yahweh and Yeshua, specifically their depictions and interactions in the Biblical texts.
• Yahweh is described as a vengeful deity who kills indiscriminately while Yeshua is portrayed as compassionate, indicating a stark contrast in their natures.
• Notably, the speaker underscores that Yahweh never refers to Yeshua as his son, raising questions about the traditional doctrines linking them.

The Concept of God in Relation to Jesus 01:32:28​

"Jesus replied to them, 'My Father is working right now, and so am I.'"

• The dialogue indicates a deep relationship between Jesus and God the Father, where both are described as actively engaged in their work. The statement reflects that Jesus considers his healing acts valid, even on the day of worship, emphasizing both his authority and alignment with divine activity.

Understanding God and Yahweh 01:32:38​

"Yahweh was seen; Jesus' father has not been seen."

• This section discusses the distinction between Yahweh and the Father of Jesus. While the Old Testament accounts detail instances where Yahweh interacts with figures like Moses and David, the New Testament asserts that no one has seen God. Thus, the narrative sets a contrast between the physical manifestations of God in the Hebrew Bible and the unseen nature of God in the New Testament.

The Revealing of Mysteries 01:35:21​

"The text tells us an unveiling will take place that will reveal who Satan is."

• The speaker contends that many Christians hold a belief that all knowledge of God is already established, but scripture implies otherwise. An unveiling of new information is anticipated, especially relating to the identity of Satan, suggesting a continuous journey of discovery in understanding spiritual truths as Christ's return approaches.

The Role of Lawlessness 01:36:20​

"The man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction who opposes and exalts himself."

• This reference from 2 Thessalonians warns Christians that certain prophetic events must occur, including the revelation of a lawless figure linked to biblical prophecies. The speaker connects this to the concept of the abomination of desolation, indicating that these revelations precede significant eschatological events.

Blinded Minds and New Realizations 01:39:51​

"The god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers."

• The text highlights that many who do not believe are unable to perceive the gospel's truth because of a malevolent influence—the god of this world. This further elaborates on how spiritual blindness can obstruct one's understanding of divine realities, urging believers to seek new insights that expose deeper truths.

The Importance of Context in Biblical Texts 01:43:21​

"When I read the text, I'm curious about what I'm reading and I go, 'Wait, it's just this massive sudden switch... there's an entire conversation or at least a large part of a conversation that's just completely deleted from the text.'"

• The speaker highlights a notable transition between verses 7 and 8 in the book of Job, emphasizing that the shift lacks sufficient context, indicating possible missing dialogue between God and Satan.
• This observation leads to a reflection on the necessity of thorough reading and contemplation of scripture; understanding complex texts requires more than just a cursory glance.
• They suggest a habit of immersing oneself in the text, recommending listening to the Bible regularly to uncover deeper meanings and insights.

The Continuous Journey of Learning from Scripture 01:45:10​

"The more you know, the more you know you don't know."

• The speaker expresses a humble acknowledgment of their continuous learning process through habitual engagement with the Bible; this immersion reveals the depths and intricacies of the text.
• They highlight that knowledge of scripture is an ongoing journey, where each reading provides new revelations that contribute to one's understanding.
• The speaker encourages others to also embrace the scripture, suggesting that becoming scholars allows for a more profound grasp of biblical teachings.

Yahweh and the Concept of Adversary 01:47:34​

"Yahweh is the adversary. Yahweh is Satan, and Roman universalism has flipped the script on us."

• This segment conveys a provocative thesis that equates Yahweh, traditionally viewed as the God of the Bible, with the adversarial figure of Satan.
• The speaker posits that historical interpretations have obscured this relationship, advocating for a reinterpretation of scripture that aligns with their view of Yahweh's role.
• They reference specific biblical passages to substantiate their arguments, implying that the established narrative may warrant reevaluation based on direct textual evidence.

Descriptions of Beasts in Revelation and Yahweh's Self-image 01:51:45​

"Yahweh describes himself the exact same way Yeshua describes the beast."

• The speaker draws a striking parallel between the descriptions of the beast in Revelation and Yahweh’s self-descriptions in the book of Hosea, suggesting they share similar traits.
• Such comparisons raise questions about the nature of divine characteristics as depicted in scripture and distinguish the roles attributed to Yahweh and those attributed to Yeshua (Jesus).
• This segment serves as a critical examination of theological concepts, aligning descriptions to provoke thought regarding identity and roles within biblical narratives.

The Identity of Yahweh as Satan 01:54:38​

"Yahweh is the devil; Yahweh is the Satan."

• The speaker discusses evidence from biblical texts that suggest a controversial identity for Yahweh. They highlight parallels between passages in Revelation 13 and Hosea 13, indicating that descriptions of the beast align with how Yahweh portrays Himself.
• The speaker expresses disbelief that Christianity has overlooked this connection for two millennia, suggesting this oversight is not accidental but by design.

The Devil's Role in Scripture 01:55:38​

"You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires."

• The reference to John 8:44 is used to emphasize the biblical portrayal of the devil as a deceiver and murderer from the beginning, which the speaker argues also applies to Yahweh.
• The speaker claims many Christians avoid discussing this scripture, suggesting that it inadvertently implicates Yahweh in the role of Satan.

Yahweh Explicitly Named as Satan 01:56:35​

"The word Satan means the adversary."

• The text outlines the first appearance of the term "Satan" in the Bible, highlighting a story in 2 Samuel 24 where Yahweh incites David to conduct a census, while the same account in 1 Chronicles 21 attributes the incitement to Satan.
• This contradiction raises questions about the nature of Yahweh and suggests a dual identity as both a deity and an adversary.

The Mark of the Beast 01:58:19​

"This mark of the beast is a real physical mark."

• The speaker describes the mark of the beast as a tangible symbol required for participation in economic activities, contrasting it with modern interpretations such as microchips or vaccines.
• They draw parallels between this mark and practices in ancient marketplaces, stressing that adherence to this mark has historical precedent and links it to Yahweh's commands.

Misinterpretations of Paul's Writings 02:00:08​

"I wish you would bear with me in a little foolishness."

• The speaker critiques a passage from 2 Corinthians 11, arguing that Paul's statements do not hold doctrinal weight and are instead mere gibberish.
• They assert that Paul's teachings are inconsistent with the broader biblical narrative, claiming he has no significant role to play in the events foretold in scripture.

Marcion and Early Christian Thought 02:03:24​

"Marcion responded by developing a ditheistic system of belief."

• The speaker discusses Marcion, an early church figure who proposed a dualistic view of God, which he felt reconciled contradictions between the Old and New Testaments.
• They suggest that, with contemporary knowledge, Marcion's insights could lead to a better understanding of the relationship between the Hebrew Bible's God and the teachings of Jesus.

The Historical Context of Marshawn 02:05:09​

"Christianity has lied to us about the identity of the snake... because Roman universalism was so powerful, they called him a heretic."

• The video discusses the historical figure Marshawn, an early church father, who was seen as a significant threat to Christianity. His perspectives challenged prevailing beliefs about Yahweh and the serpent, suggesting that traditional narratives have obscured the true nature of these figures.
• Marshawn's views led to his excommunication and the systematic destruction of his writings, raising questions about what ideas have been suppressed in religious history.

The Loss of Knowledge and Connection to Ancient Texts 02:06:31​

"I found this information not by going down a rabbit trail but through completely separate avenues."

• The speaker emphasizes personal research leading to the discovery of Marshawn and the broader implications of his teachings. The acknowledgement of lost texts and early church writings invites a reevaluation of what is known about early Christianity.
• The speaker expresses a combination of surprise and excitement upon finding alignment between Marshawn’s views and their own understanding of Yahweh, pointing out that individuals have felt this way in the past but these connections have been largely overlooked.

Symbolism and Misunderstanding of Deities 02:07:42​

"Rome has invented fairy tales to fool humanity into worshiping Satan and turned Yeshua into Satan."

• This section touches on the idea that traditional narratives within Christianity have distorted the understanding of spiritual beings. It suggests that popular depictions of God and Jesus (Yeshua) are misleading and rooted in a deeper historical conflict of ideologies.
• The speaker makes a bold claim that figures like Yahweh are exceptionally misrepresented, referencing ancient symbols and artworks that collectively tell a different story about these deities. They stress the importance of recognizing these symbols as historical rather than purely mythological.

The Nature of Eternal Life and Identity of God 02:08:21​

"Eternal life isn't like some spirit; it's as a biologically immortal being living freely with Yeshua and his father."

• The video asserts a view of eternal life that opposes common perceptions of a spiritual afterlife, instead suggesting a tangible and physical existence alongside divine beings. This perspective seeks to ground spiritual concepts in a more relatable context.
• The distinction made between different gods challenges traditional Christian interpretations of God and the relationships between beings in the divine hierarchy, arguing for a more nuanced understanding of their roles as depicted in various historical myths and texts.

Predictions of Future Events and Deception 02:15:06​

"The greatest deception of all is coming where the beast, the abomination of desolation, Yahweh himself, is going to appear in the newly rebuilt temple."

• The speaker warns of future events in which themes of deception are prevalent, notably the anticipated appearance of a figure likened to Yahweh in a rebuilt temple. This highlights a fear of mass misunderstanding within Christianity about who this figure really is and what they represent.
• The narrative reflects on prophetic literature and themes of judgment, suggesting that without a deeper understanding of their beliefs, many will be misled by appearances alone.

The Coming Deception and Choice 02:15:52​

"The greatest deception that's ever come upon humanity is at our doorstep."

• The speaker suggests that a significant deception is unfolding in the world, implying that it will have severe implications for humanity. They express concerns that fundamental texts, such as the Bible, may become outlawed or illegal, positioning this scenario as part of a larger existential struggle.
• The concept of a "final battle" is introduced, indicating a clash between opposing forces, with the speaker firmly aligning themselves with Yeshua Hamashiach (Jesus Christ). This choice is described as a pathway to eternal life and access to the "fruit of the tree of life."
• The dialogue emphasizes that the ongoing struggle involves ancient and familiar figures like Yeshua and Satan, hinting at a cyclical nature of history where the same entities reappear in new forms.

Community Connection and Support 02:16:51​

"If you'd like to support me and get your name on the ticker, please do so."

• The speaker provides multiple avenues for the audience to support their work, highlighting platforms like Cash App, Venmo, and PayPal. They underscore the significance of community support in allowing them to continue their studies and sharing of information.
• An invitation is extended for the viewers to join a community app dedicated to their work for deeper engagement. This app aims to foster a closer connection among followers and offers a platform for continual learning and interaction.
• The importance of signing up for a mailing list is stressed, enabling the audience to receive updates and keep informed about future discussions and studies.

Choosing a Side: Light vs. Darkness 02:19:12​

"This really is about choosing a side: a side of peace and love, or a side of slavery and deception."

• The speaker concludes with a powerful message about the moral choices that humanity faces, framing the struggle as a dichotomy between light and darkness. They advocate for choosing the path that embodies peace, love, and humanity rather than one driven by deception and darkness.
• A spiritual blessing is shared, emphasizing a hope for guidance and peace in the lives of the audience. The speaker encourages viewers to reflect on their position in this unfolding narrative, urging a thoughtful investigation into the information presented.

 

[Petunia]

I agree with the first part of the video:

• The video emphasizes that belief is not merely about faith in people or oneself, but rather involves constructing ideas in our minds and latching onto them as truths.
• This uncritical acceptance can lead to dangerous outcomes as individuals start to claim these constructed beliefs as their identity, stating, “I am a [belief].”
• It highlights the notion that borrowing beliefs from others without critically contemplating them can lead to a loss of one's true self and identity.

But Anderson states that Jesus is the snake in the garden of Eden and YHWH is Satan. This reasoning isn’t supported by Scripture:

The key text that debunks his reasoning is Revelation 12:9 “And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.”
So Christ himself said to John that the serpent was Satan. If the serpent was Satan, JC was NOT the serpent. And if the serpent was Satan, YHWH who cursed the serpent was NOT Satan.

2. Job 1 and 2 is a discussion between YHWH and Satan (not as he states in the video between God and Satan). So YHWH is NOT Satan.

3. Although YHWH’s name isn’t in the NT, Jesus refers numerous time to the OT where YHWH is mentioned. Mat.22:37 “Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.” Deut. 6:5 says: “love YHWH thy God” …
So JC said we must love YHWH. He wouldn’t encourage us to love Satan, so YHWH can not be Satan.

4. He stated in the video that the Bible doesn’t mention that YHWH has a son.

Psalms 2:7 I will declare the decree: YHWH hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. See: Heb. 5:5

Hosea 11:1 When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt. See: Mat. 2:15

See: 2 Sam.7:12-14 and Luke 1:31-35
See also Psalms 89:26-29 (He shall cry unto me, Thou art my father, my God).

5. Anderson says that the serpent didn’t lie, but that’s false, isn’t it?
Gen.3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die.

6. Gen. 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee (the snake, who he claims to be JC) and the woman, and between thy seed ((JC) and her seed; it shall bruise thy (JC) head, and thou (JC) shalt bruise his heel.
If JC was the snake his head would be bruised, not his heel!
Also Scripture proves JC was the promised seed (Gal.3:16; Mat.1:1).

 

[Outcast]

I really like this thread, as it does merge with my beliefs about how we read and understand scripture. There is a lot of thinking involved in the study of scripture that, in my experience, doesn't happen very often.

Our willingness to clear off the slate of beliefs that we may have accepted from teachers and preachers and examine scripture anew is not common at all.

People can be and are deceived easily. As I wonder why that is, I should not have to think very deep to know. I, also, was a person who accepted what was taught by people who supposedly were knowledgeable. As I attended schools to become another "knowledgeable" person, I adapted easily to repeating the things said to me. I thought I understood.

Yahweh woke me up. That caused me a lot of stress, because I wanted that warm fuzzy feeling of being accepted by those around me and respected for my knowledge. Depending on God for truth upset that apple cart. There is no shortage of people who will come up with other understandings which will be accepted as true simply because some "expert" told us to.

I like Petunia's response, because it suggests that she paid close attention - a rarity in my experience.

I accept no truth as "etched in granite" until Yahweh and His Son confirms it to me. It all causes me to think, and that is a good thing.

Thank you Lori Jane for this thread.

 

[LeeB]

The spirit of YAHWEH is able to overcome obstacles of men that obscure HIS truth. Bad translations or deliberate alterations are no obstacle to the person having HIS spirit. It is like having a spiritual sixth sense that enables the saints to become lie detectors. Upon hearing some idea being preached this sixth sense kicks in and informs us of its being truth or lie. This gift is part of the gift of discernment, trying the spirits to see if they are from YAHWEH or not. It is all by divine revelation, our human spirit connected to YAHWEH through Jesus Christ.

 

[Lori Jane]

Thanks for the replies so far. I will dig into them and reply. I'm not married to this but have to admit I am compelled by it. Still digging to see if I'm compelled enough to plant my flag so to speak. In the meantime...

How do we reconcile these two scriptures?

When King David numbered his people it was a transgression according to God, because it was a matter of pride and/or a way of seeking assurances "safety in numbers" rather than relying on God for his victories. For this he got punished with a plague.

What is most interesting about this is the two different versions in the Bible that covers this. 2 Samuel 24 and 1 Chronicles 21, and how they may seem to diverge in some ways. But do they really?

in 1 Chronicles 21:1, Satan is the one that "provoked" David into this numbering. "And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel."

In 2 Samuel 24:1, it is "The Lord", (YHWH) that urges David to do the numbering."Again the anger of the Lord burned against Israel, and he incited David against them, saying, “Go and take a census of Israel and Judah.”

 

[LeeB]

Thanks for the replies so far. I will dig into them and reply. I'm not married to this but have to admit I am compelled by it. Still digging to see if I'm compelled enough to plant my flag so to speak. In the meantime...

How do we reconcile these two scriptures?

When King David numbered his people it was a transgression according to God, because it was a matter of pride and/or a way of seeking assurances "safety in numbers" rather than relying on God for his victories. For this he got punished with a plague.

What is most interesting about this is the two different versions in the Bible that covers this. 2 Samuel 24 and 1 Chronicles 21, and how they may seem to diverge in some ways. But do they really?

in 1 Chronicles 21:1, Satan is the one that "provoked" David into this numbering. "And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel."

In 2 Samuel 24:1, it is "The Lord", (YHWH) that urges David to do the numbering."Again the anger of the Lord burned against Israel, and he incited David against them, saying, “Go and take a census of Israel and Judah.”

The “he” in 2 Samuel 24:1 is Satan, who was allowed by YAHWEH to tempt David to do this numbering. James 1:13 YAHWEH tempts no one. Some translations use a capital H with the word He assuming it is YAHWEH but other translations use a small h which is in agreement with YAHWEHS character. 1 Chronicles 21:1 specifically identifies Satan as the tempter.
It is totally out of character for YAHWEH to cause people to sin and then punish them for it. Matthew 6:13 is a bad translation. “Let us not be led into temptation “ is better and agrees with 1 Corinthians 10:13

 

[Petunia]

2 Sam. 24:1 “And he moved David against them”

Benson: The reader must observe that, as there is no nominative case before the verb here, in the original, to express who moved David, the most strict rendering of the clause would be, There was who moved David against them

By our version, the reader is led to suppose that the Lord, mentioned in the foregoing part of the sentence, moved David to commit this sin of numbering the people. But this is not only quite contrary to the nature and attributes of God, but to what we are expressly told 1 Chronicles 21:1, where we learn that it was Satan, and not the Lord, that moved David to do this. Here then we have a very remarkable instance, which cannot be too much regarded, to warn us against building any particular doctrine, or belief, on certain particular, detached expressions or passages of Scripture, not in harmony with the general tenor of God’s oracles; especially such doctrines as are entirely opposite to the essential nature or attributes of God. For had not this fact of David’s numbering the people been related, through the care of divine providence, by another sacred writer, who entirely clears God from having any concern in moving David to sin, it might have been concluded from the passage before us that God impelled David to this act; and, consequently, that it is consistent with the nature and government of God to excite the human mind to sinful acts: than which there can scarce be any thing more impious imagined. And therefore we may plainly see from hence, that we are not to form our notions from particular passages or expressions of the Holy Scriptures, but from the general tenor of them.

See: https://biblehub.com/commentaries/2_samuel/24-1.htm