I would again , I say again, because I have already addressed this claim that Christians are under some or all of the law. Paul explains that when a covenant is made no one takes anything from it or adds anything to it. This is true of both old and new covenants. Galatians 3:15. This agrees with what Jesus said about the law. Matthew 5:17 Now in his post Walter asked for our opinions as to what Matthew 6:33 means. First the verse says “to seek first the kingdom of GOD and HIS righteousness” A question to ask is, will the law provide us with this righteousness of GOD . Well if it did then Jesus died for nothing. Galatians 2:21 The very righteousness you must have to seek the kingdom does not come by the law. How plain this is. The true righteousness cannot come through the law if it is a gift from GOD because of faith. I stressed the importance of how Abraham was imputed righteousness because of faith 400 years before GOD gave the law to Israel by Moses. Now Walter recently posted an article claiming that the law and the Sabbath were given when GOD ceased HIS work of creation. I showed that the Sabbath under the law was Israel’s rest from slavery in Egypt, Deuteronomy 5:15 , and not connected to the Sabbath in Genesis 2:3 I also showed that GOD did not make the old covenant with Israel’s fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Deuteronomy 5:3
The truth is this, none of the things that are in the new covenant were contained in the old. The law, all 613 commandments, are yet in full force today on all the unconverted world. Romans 3:19 These 613 commandments are what Jesus was referring too in Matthew 5:17 What people like Herbert W. Armstrong, William Dankenbring and a host of others have done is butcher the law. They remove parts of it while retaining others. How does this agree with what Christ said ? When I attended Armstrongs church I came to know the law very well, we all did because it was the heart of all Armstrong taught. This type of deception is extremely powerful and dangerous as it alienates us from Christ. The law was a shadow that in symbolism and rituals only hinted at the substance , the reality of what Jesus accomplished in fulfilling the law. Why continue trying to keep a law that scripture says condemns us all to death for failing to keep it? Why , if Christ fulfilled the law that we could not fulfill, would we continue trying to keep it ?
The law can only be fulfilled with agape, GODS love, that does not come by the law but as a gift of the Holy Spirit. Romans 5:5 This is the message of the gospel. All people are condemned to death because of the sin of Adam, then the law entered to make sin even more sinful, this amounts to a double death sentence, one by Adam and one by the law. GODS answer to humanities problems was Christ, a man specially created by GOD with GODS own nature of love and righteousness and if we believe that this righteous man gave his life to not only forgive us but pass us over into a new covenant that contains mercy, the ability to repent, forgiveness, justification all through the gift of GODS spirit whereas under the law you had this; Hebrews 10:28 Neither Jesus , the prophets or Apostles fulfilled the law by keeping its works but with the love of GOD that does fulfill the law. Romans 13:10 Jesus gave two great commandments based on GODS love, not the law and even said this; Mark 12:29,30,31 “no other commandment is greater than these” . The two commandments that Jesus gave us are greater that the ten commandments . GOD was responsible for all of these things and provided HIS son to accomplish what the law never could. Romans 8:3
The sad thing about all this writing I have done is that it will probably not make any difference to people bent on law keeping. However it is possible for a law keeper to see the truth and be set free from a double death sentence, I was.
The truth is this, none of the things that are in the new covenant were contained in the old. The law, all 613 commandments, are yet in full force today on all the unconverted world. Romans 3:19 These 613 commandments are what Jesus was referring too in Matthew 5:17 What people like Herbert W. Armstrong, William Dankenbring and a host of others have done is butcher the law. They remove parts of it while retaining others. How does this agree with what Christ said ? When I attended Armstrongs church I came to know the law very well, we all did because it was the heart of all Armstrong taught. This type of deception is extremely powerful and dangerous as it alienates us from Christ. The law was a shadow that in symbolism and rituals only hinted at the substance , the reality of what Jesus accomplished in fulfilling the law. Why continue trying to keep a law that scripture says condemns us all to death for failing to keep it? Why , if Christ fulfilled the law that we could not fulfill, would we continue trying to keep it ?
The law can only be fulfilled with agape, GODS love, that does not come by the law but as a gift of the Holy Spirit. Romans 5:5 This is the message of the gospel. All people are condemned to death because of the sin of Adam, then the law entered to make sin even more sinful, this amounts to a double death sentence, one by Adam and one by the law. GODS answer to humanities problems was Christ, a man specially created by GOD with GODS own nature of love and righteousness and if we believe that this righteous man gave his life to not only forgive us but pass us over into a new covenant that contains mercy, the ability to repent, forgiveness, justification all through the gift of GODS spirit whereas under the law you had this; Hebrews 10:28 Neither Jesus , the prophets or Apostles fulfilled the law by keeping its works but with the love of GOD that does fulfill the law. Romans 13:10 Jesus gave two great commandments based on GODS love, not the law and even said this; Mark 12:29,30,31 “no other commandment is greater than these” . The two commandments that Jesus gave us are greater that the ten commandments . GOD was responsible for all of these things and provided HIS son to accomplish what the law never could. Romans 8:3
The sad thing about all this writing I have done is that it will probably not make any difference to people bent on law keeping. However it is possible for a law keeper to see the truth and be set free from a double death sentence, I was.
Last edited: