Has this article ever been used to unmask the blatant hypocrisy and double standard when applying the 2 Witness rule when forming a judicial committee?
The opening paragraph clearly states “ a judicial committee would be formed on the basis of strong circumstantial evidence of sexual immorality”. This is a clear example where Watchtower speaks from both sides of their mouth! For sexual abuse one needs 2 witnesses, but if 2 consenting adults spend the night together under improper circumstances (meaning sleep together) does constitute a sin meriting a judicial committee. Has this been used to unmasked the hypocrisy I would like. I am incensed by this Question from readers!!
Regards David
When an Unmarried Couple’s Conduct Warrants Judicial Action (jw.org)
The opening paragraph clearly states “ a judicial committee would be formed on the basis of strong circumstantial evidence of sexual immorality”. This is a clear example where Watchtower speaks from both sides of their mouth! For sexual abuse one needs 2 witnesses, but if 2 consenting adults spend the night together under improper circumstances (meaning sleep together) does constitute a sin meriting a judicial committee. Has this been used to unmasked the hypocrisy I would like. I am incensed by this Question from readers!!
Regards David
When an Unmarried Couple’s Conduct Warrants Judicial Action (jw.org)
